SLSRPT — EDIFACT Sales Data Report Message (D.99B)

The SLSRPT message is the periodic sales data report sent by a retailer or point of sale to a supplier or central organisation: it carries sales volumes per item reference, per outlet and per period, sometimes enriched with average prices and variances against forecasts. It drives production and replenishment decisions, particularly in mass retail. This page summarises the segment structure as published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.99B.

Purpose

The SLSRPT message is the periodic sales data report sent by a retailer or point of sale to a supplier or central organisation: it carries sales volumes per item reference, per outlet and per period, sometimes enriched with average prices and variances against forecasts. It drives production and replenishment decisions, particularly in mass retail.

This page focuses on the structure published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.99B. The segments listed, their status (M / C), position and repetition factor are extracted from the official file slsrpt_c.htm hosted on service.unece.org.

Segment structure

The SLSRPT D.99B message has 15 header entries, 49 detail entries and 0 summary entries (segments and groups combined). Groups are shown in bold and their members are indented by actual nesting depth.

Header

Detail

Summary

No segment in this section.

Changes vs D.96A

Top-level differences between D.96A and D.99B for the SLSRPT message (segments directly inside header / detail / summary, ignoring nested groups). The comparison is indicative: a given tag may have evolved inside nested groups without showing up in this synthesis.

Segments added vs D.96A

• MKS in the header section (status C, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• FTX in the detail section (status C, repeat ×5) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• CUX in the detail section (status C, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• PAI in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• STS in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.

Status changes (M ↔ C)

• PRI (detail): status C in D.96A → M in D.99B.

Max-repeat changes

• PRI (detail): repeat ×5 in D.96A → ×1 in D.99B.

Structural example

Minimal example of an SLSRPT D.99B message with mandatory segments only. The goal is to show the exact version declared in UNH (SLSRPT:D:99B:UN) — not to replicate a full business case (see the SLSRPT D.96A page for an annotated example).

UNB+UNOC:3+5410000000123:14+5410000000456:14+260514:1430+CTRL099001'
UNH+1+SLSRPT:D:99B:UN'
BGM+74+SLS-2026-W19+9'
DTM+137:20260514:102'
DTM+90:20260513:102'
NAD+SR+5410000000123::9'
CUX+2:EUR:4'
LOC+18+FRPAR01::ZZZ'
RFF+AAU:SLS-2026-W19-OUT01'
LIN+1++3520000001234:EN'
QTY+47:23'
MOA+203:966.00'
UNT+12+1'
UNZ+1+CTRL099001'

Common errors

• Misaligned UNH tokens — The UNH+...+SLSRPT:D:99B:UN token must reflect exactly the directory in use — a mismatch between the UNH release and the release agreed with the partner is rejected by every strict validator.
• Wrong UNT segment count — The value after UNT+ must include UNH and UNT themselves. By far the most common sender-side error, regardless of the directory in use.
• Stale code lists — Between D.96A and D.99B, several code lists received new qualifiers (DTM status, RFF qualifier, NAD codes…). Reusing an older directory’s code tables triggers warnings or even rejections depending on the partner’s strict-conformance mode.

Related messages

Other versions of this message available on ediverse.io: SLSRPT D.96A, SLSRPT D.01B, SLSRPT D.10A, SLSRPT D.16B, SLSRPT D.21B, SLSRPT D.24A, SLSRPT D.97A, SLSRPT D.00B, SLSRPT D.02B, SLSRPT D.05A, SLSRPT D.08A, SLSRPT D.13B, SLSRPT D.18B, SLSRPT D.20B.

X12 functional equivalent: X12 852.

← All EDIFACT versions